The study concluded that the AHP method is more widely preferred by researchers in almost every field and application because it tends to produce more accurate results than the ANP.Īgarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. Most of the publications belonged to the technical fields, followed by social sciences. This paper concludes that the highest number of publications are from Turkey, and the highest number of publications used AHP method applications in every category. Furthermore, another objective of this study is to compare total publications by year, publications by field by year, and lastly, observe the distribution by country of the studies. This paper aims to classify the publications on AHP and ANP methods from the years 2000 to 2019 to identify recognized journals based on their indexes. For this purpose, data was collected from 920 research papers after a vigorous literature review using different search engines. These two methods provide multiple solutions to researchers in these fields, which is why they are being considered in the current study. Such applications are spread over the years with publications in various major areas such as engineering/technology/applied sciences, social sciences, health sciences, and environmental studies. The AHP and ANP methods have contributed to decision-making in complex situations in recent years and possess widespread applications. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.This research aims to analyze a literature review of publications that have incorporated the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) methods. r 2004 International Federation of Operational Research Societies. The user is guided through a sequence of four steps which lead to a consistent or near consistent matrix. This paper presents an expert module intervening after each pairwise comparison, which contradicts the comparisons made so far, explains it, and suggests a consistent alternative. Feedback after the completion of the comparison matrix is frustrating to the user, because it gives no hints about the comparisons to reconsider. To improve an inconsistent matrix, a user can be urged to reconsider pairwise comparisons until the consistency measure proves to be satisfactory (e.g. Especially for high-order matrices, consistency is difficult to reach if the alternatives can only be measured on an ordinal scale. The calculated priorities are plausible only if the comparison matrices are consistent or near consistent. 11 (2004) 97–105 INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) evaluates decision alternatives by pairwise comparison, thus allowing more accurate judgements than the simple weighted product model (Saaty, 1994, pp. Keywords: Multiple criteria decision AHP comparison matrix consistency transitivity reciprocity expert module explanations. An expert module detects rule transgressions, explains them (How-explanations), suggests alternatives (What If-explanations) and gives hints on how to continue the comparison process. We describe a Prolog application which helps the decision-maker to build a consistent matrix or a matrix with a controlled error. This condition is reached ifFwithin the pairwise comparison processFthe transitivity and reciprocity rules are respected. Lusti WWZ/Information Systems, University of Basel, 4003 Basel, Switzerland E-mail: Received 10 March 2002 received in revised form 14 March 2003 accepted In AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process), the calculated priorities are plausible only if the comparison matrices are consistent or near consistent. Abstract An expert module to improve the consistency of AHP matrices A.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |